Featuring a minor wording tweak as suggested by Newbyte. Related: https://docs.postmarketos.org/pmcr/main/0009-new-main-device-category.html Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith <ollieparanoid@postmarketos.org> Part-of: <https://gitlab.postmarketos.org/postmarketOS/pmaports/-/merge_requests/8237>
237 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
237 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
# Device Categorization
|
|
|
|
Devices that are working quite well get lost in the [big matrix of booting
|
|
devices](https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Devices). To improve the situation,
|
|
devices postmarketOS runs on have been grouped into the following categories.
|
|
|
|
## Categories
|
|
|
|
### Main
|
|
|
|
Requirements:
|
|
* The [postmarketOS team](https://postmarketos.org/team) must endorse the new
|
|
device.
|
|
* A device maintainer team of at least 5 people, of which the majority are
|
|
part of the [postmarketOS team](https://postmarketos.org/team).
|
|
* The postmarketOS team and device maintainer teams must cover their
|
|
responsibilities as listed below. Within the teams, they must figure out
|
|
themselves who covers what responsibilities.
|
|
* Hardware CI in at least two locations for (in total) at least 3 devices.
|
|
* Boot via UEFI.
|
|
* Must use
|
|
[generic postmarketOS kernels](https://docs.postmarketos.org/pmaports/main/generic-kernels.html)
|
|
* Must not depend on forked device-specific packages, such as forks of
|
|
`alsa-ucm-conf`.
|
|
* Must use a generic device package for the target architecture.
|
|
* Everything from community (see below).
|
|
|
|
Responsibilities for the postmarketOS team:
|
|
* Regularly checking if requirements are still fulfilled, and if not:
|
|
* Discuss with the device maintainers team.
|
|
* Make calls for help early to e.g. find new members for the device
|
|
maintainers team.
|
|
* Remove the device from main after 6 months of having the requirements
|
|
unfulfilled.
|
|
|
|
Responsibilities for the device maintainer team:
|
|
* `device-$vendor-$codename.md`:
|
|
* Maintain a file inside pmaports that
|
|
explains what features are working, and which ones are not.
|
|
* The working features should allow to use the device in most common use
|
|
cases. A phone for example would typically have calls, SMS, mobile data,
|
|
Wi-Fi, audio, battery charging, Bluetooth and camera. Exceptions can be
|
|
made by the device maintainer team, together with reasoning why they are
|
|
necessary (e.g. fingerprint reader is not working because the driver is
|
|
missing). The postmarketOS team decides if the port is complete enough for
|
|
the main category based on that list.
|
|
* Organize regular meetings with device maintainers.
|
|
* Organize regular meetings with vendors (if we have contacts there).
|
|
* Long-term commitment for the device.
|
|
* People can step down as needed of course, if possible try to give an
|
|
advance notice.
|
|
* Please don't try to get a device in main if you plan to be away soon.
|
|
* Kernel maintenance (Fixing regressions on the kernel side, new kernel
|
|
developments).
|
|
* Triage issues found by the community and HW CI regressions.
|
|
* Documentation for this device.
|
|
* Making sure Hardware CI works (wires are connected, preparing CI).
|
|
* Manual testing where necessary.
|
|
|
|
### Community
|
|
|
|
Requirements:
|
|
|
|
* Maintained by at least one person
|
|
* Well documented installation instructions on device wiki page
|
|
* Close-to-mainline kernel
|
|
* Kernel must pass `pmbootstrap kconfig check --community`, which includes
|
|
working firewall
|
|
([#1119](https://gitlab.postmarketos.org/postmarketOS/pmaports/-/issues/1119))
|
|
* Automatic kernel upgrades must work <!-- TODO: move the list below elsewhere
|
|
and reference it to make this list shorter -->
|
|
* When upgrading the kernel, the new kernel must be used on reboot
|
|
* Android devices where a new `boot.img` must be flashed after upgrade need
|
|
`deviceinfo_flash_kernel_on_update=true`.
|
|
* For other devices which directly boot a kernel from a boot partition, or
|
|
which use lk2nd, usually nothing needs to be done.
|
|
* Maintainer(s) must take part in the workflow for new postmarketOS releases:
|
|
* Join the [testing
|
|
channel](https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Matrix_and_IRC) coordinate the
|
|
release
|
|
* Testing their device and related fixing issues, according to the
|
|
[timeline](https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Creating_a_release_branch#Timeline)
|
|
(test yourself/coordinate with the
|
|
[Testing Team](https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Testing_Team); testing
|
|
one device per SoC is enough for community devices, but of course more is
|
|
better)
|
|
* 2021-11 and later: track record of upgrading the kernel, device kernel or SoC
|
|
kernel must at least have been upgraded through 3 kernel releases
|
|
* Kernel must be upgraded regularly; the kernel version used by the device may not
|
|
be older than 6 months. The age of the kernel version is determined by the date
|
|
the release was
|
|
[tagged](https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/refs/tags)
|
|
upstream by Linus Torvalds or the stable kernel maintainers.
|
|
For e.g. version 6.12.3, the date would be that of the specific patch release,
|
|
not that of the initial 6.12 release
|
|
|
|
Regarding device features (calls working, camera, ...), there is not a fixed
|
|
feature set (so for users, don't assume that everything works, look at the
|
|
device's wiki page for details).
|
|
|
|
The purpose of community is to increase visibility of devices that:
|
|
|
|
* A lot of work was put into
|
|
* Are (and stay) working quite well (i.e. they are useful in some way and are
|
|
tested occasionally to find and fix regressions)
|
|
* Are still being improved or are considered completed at some point
|
|
|
|
### Testing
|
|
|
|
Requirements:
|
|
|
|
* Must run a close-to-mainline kernel
|
|
* Port and dependencies build
|
|
* The device boots
|
|
|
|
### Downstream
|
|
|
|
Requirements:
|
|
|
|
* Port and dependencies build
|
|
* The device boots
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
Device ports using vendor/downstream kernels. Can be moved to _testing_
|
|
once a mainline port appears. Kernels and devices in this category might be
|
|
moved to _archived_ if no longer building and either lack a maintainer or the
|
|
maintainer is unresponsive for months.
|
|
|
|
## Archived
|
|
|
|
Ports are moved to this category if:
|
|
|
|
* The port has been replaced with a better alternative (e.g. ports using
|
|
downstream kernels when a functional mainline port exists).
|
|
* The port no longer boots with the current version of postmarketOS, and the
|
|
port doesn't have an active maintainer to fix it.
|
|
|
|
Archived ports aren't listed in `pmbootstrap init` and binary packages are not
|
|
built for them. Still, they can be manually selected and built by entering the
|
|
device codename. A warning is displayed with the reason why they have been
|
|
archived.
|
|
|
|
This category was formerly called *unmaintained*
|
|
([!1912](https://gitlab.postmarketos.org/postmarketOS/pmaports/-/merge_requests/1912),
|
|
[!5046](https://gitlab.postmarketos.org/postmarketOS/pmaports/-/merge_requests/5046)).
|
|
|
|
## Official Images
|
|
|
|
Official images are built by [BPO](https://build.postmarketos.org). We
|
|
configure the images as follows:
|
|
|
|
* Build images for _all_ devices in main and community
|
|
* Build images for _some_ devices in testing, maintainers may
|
|
[enable building images](https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Bpo#Image_configuration) if:
|
|
* The port runs a mainline kernel.
|
|
* The port is actively maintained.
|
|
* The maintainer has been active for some time (~6 months).
|
|
|
|
We may adjust these rules again, e.g. depending on how many testing devices will
|
|
be added over time. Testing images may be removed again, e.g. if they don't
|
|
build anymore because of device specific problems.
|
|
|
|
## Maintainers
|
|
|
|
A device maintainer must own the device and be able to test changes. They must
|
|
make sure that the device port stays in good shape.
|
|
|
|
## Moving between categories
|
|
|
|
### Moving to a higher category
|
|
|
|
Moving from testing to community, from community to main or even from testing
|
|
straight to main.
|
|
|
|
#### Request process
|
|
|
|
* Make sure that the device fulfills all requirements for the new category (see
|
|
table above).
|
|
* Create a new merge request in which you move the files.
|
|
* Add new maintainers to the device's APKBUILD, if necessary.
|
|
|
|
#### Review process
|
|
|
|
* Everyone should be given the chance to look at the entire device port again,
|
|
to identify issues/possible improvements. Therefore the MR should not be
|
|
merged before a *minimum time of one week* passed. Usually, the MR should be
|
|
in good shape when opened, and only minor fixups should need to be done
|
|
before merging. If that is the case, then it is one week after the MR was
|
|
opened. Otherwise, one week after there were the last significant changes.
|
|
* Reviewers should look at all files that were moved and add comments as
|
|
necessary. (GitLab currently doesn't allow in-line comments for moved files
|
|
([#213446](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/213446)), so
|
|
just add comments below the merge request.)
|
|
* Reviewers should verify that the device fulfills all requirements for the new
|
|
category (see table above).
|
|
* Reviewers should pay special attention to consistency issues, as outlined in
|
|
[postmarketos#24](https://gitlab.postmarketos.org/postmarketOS/postmarketos/-/issues/24).
|
|
* Consistency issues/possible improvements in the existing features (not
|
|
missing features) should be discussed and ideally fixed before merge.
|
|
Consistency changes that require lots of work should be documented as issues
|
|
an expect to be fixed in the future, but should not unnecessarily delay
|
|
merge.
|
|
* Before merging, the MR must have at least *four approvals*, 2 of which should
|
|
be from Core Contributors.
|
|
|
|
#### After merge
|
|
|
|
* Change the category of the devices in the wiki
|
|
* When moved from testing to community:
|
|
[enable building images](https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Bpo#Image_configuration)
|
|
|
|
### Moving to a lower category
|
|
|
|
If rules to keep a device in a category are no longer fulfilled, an attempt to
|
|
contact the device maintainers and make them aware of the situation must be
|
|
made. The maintainers then have two weeks to ensure the device meets the criteria
|
|
again. Maintainers can request additional time in response, but only up to one
|
|
more month from the time they were contacted. If a stable release is scheduled
|
|
for branching in that timeframe, additional time can only be requested up until
|
|
the date of the branching.
|
|
|
|
If the maintainers cannot be contacted, or if two weeks and any additionally
|
|
requested time pass and the device still does not meet the criteria, a merge
|
|
request to move them to the now appropriate category should be opened.
|
|
|
|
Merge requests moving a device to a lower category are subject to the standard
|
|
[pmaports approval rules](./approval-rules).
|
|
|
|
## See also
|
|
|
|
* [postmarketos#25](https://gitlab.postmarketos.org/postmarketOS/postmarketos/-/issues/25) requirements for devices in main
|
|
* [postmarketos#24](https://gitlab.postmarketos.org/postmarketOS/postmarketos/-/issues/24) requirements for devices in community
|
|
* [postmarketos#16](https://gitlab.postmarketos.org/postmarketOS/postmarketos/-/issues/16)
|
|
Increase visibility of actively maintained devices
|
|
* [postmarketos#11](https://gitlab.postmarketos.org/postmarketOS/postmarketos/issues/11#get-serious-about-supported-devices)
|
|
Get serious about supported devices
|