Split postmarketos-base-nofde out from postmarketos-base to fix this
bootstrap problem:
postmarketos-initramfs:
provides: postmarketos-ramdisk
depends: postmarketos-fde-unlocker
postmarketos-base:
depends: postmarketos-ramdisk
provides: postmarketos-fde-unlocker (via postmarketos-base-nofde subpackage)
Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith <ollieparanoid@postmarketos.org>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.postmarketos.org/postmarketOS/pmaports/-/merge_requests/8657>
Let postmarketos-base-nofde provide a specific version of
postmarketos-fde-unlocker, so pmbootstrap considers the package for
installation. From pmb/helpers/pmaports.py:_find_package_in_apkbuild():
# Ignore provides without version, they shall never be
# automatically selected
if "=" not in provides_i:
continue
Fix for bootstrapping new repositories, which currently fails with:
ERROR: postmarketos-initramfs: dependency not found: postmarketos-fde-unlocker
...when trying to build postmarketos-cros-common or
device-valve-jupiter.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.postmarketos.org/postmarketOS/pmaports/-/merge_requests/7455>
This package was supposed to be a provider for postmarketos-fde-unlocker
(see description "Dummy unlocker package for systems without FDE") and
provider_priority=1 (whereas unl0kr has 1000)).
Fix this, so it is in theory possible to install pmOS without unl0kr
again if you want to save a little space and don't need FDE. More
importantly this also fixes bootstrapping a new reposiotry, as we can
now let postmarketos-initramfs makedepend on this package to ensure that
there is one provider for postmarketos-fde-unlocker.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.postmarketos.org/postmarketOS/pmaports/-/merge_requests/7118>
Split -nofde into a separate package to resolve the cyclic depenency:
postmarketos-base -> postmarketos-initramfs -> postmarketos-base-nofde
Fixes: issue 3236
[ci:skip-build]: already built successfully in CI
